The Disputed Deed of Henry Antle
(From
a photocopy of the original, housed at the KY Department of Libraries &
Archives, Box # 45, Accession # 1984-380.)
Willis Antle
& others
}
v
} Petition in equity
}
Geo.
W. Antle & others
(from
cover jacket of case file): 'Filed 6 October 1860, Test Junius Caldwell,
C.A.C.C.' [Clerk, Adair County Court]
Abbreviations
as used in original document:
afs'd: aforesaid
& c: and so
on
C.A.C.C: Clerk,
Adair County Court
DC: Deputy Clerk
Dec'd: deceased
Dec'dt: decedent
Deft(s):
defendant(s)
PJ acc: Presiding
Judge [?]Adair County Court
Plff(s):
plaintiff(s)
(Some
punctuation added for clarity; most original spelling maintained.)
Willis
Antle
}
George W.
Antle [name marked out] }
Lewis Antle
[name marked out] }
Nathaniel
Franklin
}
Eliza Franklin
}
James Gifford
}
Nancy Gifford
}
Warfield S.
Morrison
}
Polly Morrison
}
Plffs }
Willie D.
Sutherland
}
}
Elizabeth
Sutherland
}
}
Jacob Antle
}
}
Henry Adley
[Hadley]
}
}
Mya Adley
[Hadley]
}
}
James Grant
}
}
Sarah Grant
}
}
Everheart Antle
}
}
Petition in Equity
against }
}
George W. Antle
}
}
Lewis Antle
}
}
Samuel Floyd
}
}
Emeline Floyd
}
Defts }
John R. Antle
}
Henry M. Antle }
Letty Antle
}
The Plaintiffs Willis Antle; Nathaniel Franklin (and his wife) Eliza
Franklin (late Eliza Antle); James Gifford & his wife Nancy Gifford (late
Nancy Antle); Warfield S. Morrison & his wife Polly Morrison (late Polly
Antle); Willie D. Sutherland & his wife Elizabeth Sutherland (late
Elizabeth Antle); Jacob Antle; Henry Adley & his wife Myra Adley (Late
Myra Antle); James Grant & his wife Sarah Grant (late Sarah Antle); and
Everheart Antle
State that, their
ancestor Henry Antle who for many years before his death had been a citizen of
Adair County and resided in said county up to about the day [blank] day of
July 1859, at which time he died (intestate), leaving a widow, deft Letty
Antle; and the following children & heirs at law (to wit): the said
plaintiffs, viz: Willis Antle, Eliza Franklin (who intermarried with)
Nathaniel Franklin; Nancy Gifford, late Nancy Antle & now the wife of
James Gifford; Polly Morrison, late Polly Antle & now the wife of W.S.
Morrison; Elizabeth Sutherland (late Elizabeth Antle) & now the wife of
W.D. Sutherland; Jacob Antle; Myra Adley, late Myra Antle, now the wife of
Henry Adley; Sarah Grant (late Sarah Antle) & now the wife of James Grant;
and Everheart Antle, these being his children & heirs at law, by his first
two wives, and the following who are made defendants hereto, are the children
of said decedent by his last wife Letty as afs'd., viz: George W. Antle;
Lewis Antle: Emeline Floyd (late Emeline Antle) & now the wife of Samuel
Floyd; John R. Antle; and Henry M. Antle.
Plffs. state that
said Henry Antle, dec'd., in his lifetime owned and had in his peacible (&
adverse) possession several tracts of land, some lying in Adair County, &
some lying in Russell County.
That there was
tract containing about 119 acres & 3 poles, lying in Adair County, on the
headwaters of Crocus Creek, which land he purchased from one Daniel Vinson
& wife as will appear by reference to a copy of a deed from said Vinson
& wife, herewith filed, marked (1) as part hereof.
And he also owned
a tract of 100 acres of land lying in Russell County, on the Cabin fork of
Russells Creek, which was purchased by him from Jacob Miller & wife, and
by them conveyed to him, by deed dated about the 15th day of October 1830,
said original deed having been lost or mislaid & Plffs, not having it in
their power to file the same, they here file a copy of said original marked
(2) & made part hereof.
Said decedent
also owned & possessed other lands besides those refered to & as soon
as they can procure the evidences of title they will set them up in this
action.
Plffs state also
that at said intestate's death, he left personal property to the value of $250
to $300, consisting [word 'of' marked out] in part of the following: 1 black
mare & colt, worth $100; 1 sett blacksmith's tools worth $30; 1 four-horse
wagon worth $40; 2 milk cows & calves worth $30; four heifers worth $20;
hogs worth $10; household furniture, farming tools & c. worth $50.
Plffs state that
no administrator has been appointed to take charge of & administer said
estate but that the defts Letty Antle & George W. Antle have taken
possession of said personal property & converted it to their own use, when
in fact said property belonged to all the heirs of said decedent, & not
tot he widow & one or two of the children, and that said George &
Letty, by taking & converting to their own use said property, have thereby
become indebted to plffs for their proportionable share of the reasonable
value of said property.
Plffs state that
George Antle and Letty Antle are now living on & claim the tract of land
in Adair County on which said decedent died. And that Lewis Antle also lives
on & claims a portion of said land in said Adair County. And they further
state that said John R. Antle claims, lives on & has possession of a tract
of land lying in Russell County on the waters of Cabin fork of Russells Creek,
containing about fifty acres more or less, & being a part of the land
which rightfully, & does actually, belong to the estate of said decedent,
it being a portion of the tract conveyed to said decedent by deed from Jacob
Miller & wife as heretofore refered to. Plffs state that they understand
that said deft John R. Antle pretends to hold said land by some sort of title
derived from said decedent through deft Henry Antle.
They state also
that the land which is held & claimed by deft Georg W. Antle lies on the
head waters of Crocus Creek in Adair County as afs'd. & contains about 100
acres more or less & is in part a part of the lands owned by dec'd. &
which were conveyed to him by Vinson & wife as above stated.
They also state
that the said Lewis Antle has possession & holds about 60 acres of the
said land which belonged to said decedent & which is also in part a part
of the land conveyed by Vinson & wife as afs'd.
Plffs state that
their said ancestor Henry Antle, dec'd., was the true and proper owner of all
the lands herein before mentioned & described, at the time of his death.
Plffs further
state that their said ancestor was during his lifetime in the full, free,
unmolested, and adverse possession of all the lands herein before mentioned
& refered to, claiming & holding them as his own property, and that
the said defts George, and Lewis and John took possession of the lands now
held by them as afs'd. and are now holding them without right, against the
plffs and the legal & proper owners thereof.
Plffs state that
they, and the balance of the said heirs of said Antle, dec'd., who have been
heretofore herein mentioned, are the owners of and are entitled to the
possession of the said lands now in the possession of defts George, Lewis
& John who as they are informed hold said lands respectively, under some
sort of pretended deeds or conveyances from said decedent to them. Now Plffs
state that said deeds or conveyances each & respectively are void, that
they do not pass any title whatever from dec'dt to them, that said deeds or
conveyances are without consideration, that said deeds are wholly voyd or
voidable, that said deeds or conveyances are, & each of them, not the
act and deed of their said ancestor Henry Antle, dec'd.
The Plffs state
that for several years before the death of decedent (and before the execution
of the pretended writings above
mentioned) he [sic] said decedent on account of his great age (being at
the time of his death near or about 80 or odd years old) and from his long
& habitual & excessive use of intoxicating drinks, and from disease of
both body & mind, was incapable of rationally & properly transacting
any business of any importance, and that he was not capable mentally of
conveying his lands or other property. They state that said pretended deeds or
conveyances were obtained from decedent through & by the fraudulent
procurement of defts or others and were not the voluntary act or acts of
decedent. Nor were they made by him with a full understanding of their meaning
or true import, but were obtained from him by fraud as afs'd.
Plffs state that
said decedent was greatly under the influence, at times, of his said
wife who took great pains to cultivate & increase he [sic]
influence over him, in order to induce him to give her & the children by
her all the property. And taking advantage of his great age, & his
helplessness both of body & mind, & his appetite for liquor, she
a& her children had & exercised an undue, improper & illegal
influence over him, and by these & other improper means & influences
they succeeded in procuring from him the pretended deeds or conveyances afs'd.
Plffs state that
at the time of the pretended execution of the said writings afs'd., by said
decedent, he, said decedent, was not mentally capable of understanding what he
was doing, and that if he even signed them (which plffs deny) he did it from
threats & compulsion & not of his own unbiased will.
Plffs state that
said land is situated that it would be greatly to the injury to the interests
of all, & each of the heirs aforesaid, to divide it amongst them, that the
shares would be so small & the lands so cut up that to divide it would
render their shares of little value.
They state
said lands are not worth $100 to the share [This line marked out.]
Plffs state that
it would in their opinion re___ind greatly to the interests of all & each
of the said children & heirs at law of said decedent for the land to be
sold & its proceeds distributed.
Plffs therefore
pray that the said widow may have her dower laid off to her, and that defts
George & Lewis & John & all others who have possession of any of
said land may be compelled to surrender it up. And that said deeds or
conveyances (if any) be set aside & held for naught, and that said lands
be sold and the proceeds distributed according to the law of descents. And
that the plffs recover against said Letty & George $300 or whatever share
they may be entitled to for the said personal property, and also $200 against
the said George, Lewis, & John for the rent of said land & c. And for
all judgements & c that may be necessary for a full & complete
settlement of said estate & its distribution among the heirs of said
decedent, and for all other proper relief.
Suddarth & Alexander
Plffs atto's
Nathaniel
Franklin states that he believes the statements made in the foregoing petition
are true.
/s/ Nathaniel 'his X mark' Franklin
Sworn to &
subscribed before me by Nathaniel Franklin, this Oct. 5th 1860
/S/ E. ?L. Willis, PJ acc
************
Transcriber's
notes:
In the text of
the preceding lawsuit, the plaintiffs are specifically identified as Henry
Antle's 'children & heirs at law, by his first two wives': Willis
Antle; Eliza Franklin; Nancy Gifford; Polly Morrison; Elizabeth Sutherland;
Jacob Antle; Myra [H]Adley; Sarah Grant; & Everheart Antle.
As a point
of clarification, all the above except Eliza and Nancy comprise the
known children by Henry's first wife, Mary 'Polly' Simmons. By his second
wife, Eve Helm, Henry fathered only one known child, Nancy. Eliza Antle
Franklin was Henry's third (known) child by his third wife, Letty Moore.
The five
defendants and Eliza, above, comprise the known children of Henry and his
third wife, Letty Moore.
************
SUMMONS
(source
unknown, possibly the above lawsuit paperwork.)
The
Commonwealth of Kentucky to the Sheriff of Russell County, you are commanded
to summon George W. Antle, Lewis Antle, Samuel Floyd, Emeline Floyd, John R.
Antle, Henry M. Antle, Letty Antle to answer in twenty days after service of
this summons on them a petition filed against them in the Adair Circuit Court
by Willis Antle, Nathaniel Franklin, Eliza Franklin, James Giffford, Nancy
Gifford, Warfield S. Morrison, Polly Morrison, Willie D. Sutherland, Elizabeth
Sutherland, Jacob Antle, Henry Adley, Myra Adley, James Grant, Sarah Grant,
& Everheart Antle and warn them that upon their failure to answer the
petition will be taken for confessed or they will be proceeded against for
contempt & you will make due return of this summons on the first day of
the next November Term of said court.
Witness Junius
Caldwell Clerk of said court this 8th day of October 1860.
/s/ Junius
Caldwell
************
(from
cover jacket of case file): '1860 November Defts filed _____ to Plffs pet'n
& overruled to which Defts except -- Defts filed ans'r.'
Adair
Circuit Court:
Willis
Antle & others, Plts }
Against
}
Joint answer of Defts
George w. Antle
& others, defts }
Defts admit that their ancestor Henry Antle owned lands sometime prior
to his death; but they deny that at the time of his death he owned or had any
interest either in land or personal property that did not terminate with his
life. They deny that said decedent at his death left personal property of the
value of $250 to $300 or any other sum. They deny that decedent owned at this
death & left a black mare & colt worth $100 or any horse beast of any
description or value. They deny that he owned at his death & left a set of
blacksmith tools or any such tools. They deny that decedent left a four-horse
waggon as charged worth $40 or any waggon of any description or value. They
deny that decedent left any milchcows & calves or heifers of any
description or value or that he owned & left any hogs or household
property of any kind. They also deny that said decedent owned & left at
his death any farming tools of any kind belonging to his estate. They deny
that Defts Letty Antle & George W. Antle, took possession of or converted
to their own use any property of any kind that did not legally & properly
belong to them, or that belonged to all the heirs of said Henry Antle, dec'd.
but on the contrary the black mare, household property, farming tools & c.
once owned by said decedent were by him in his lifetime lawfully &
properly disposed of together with his lands by deeds regularly, legally, and
properly made & executed by said decedent in his lifetime. They deny that
defts George & Letty have become indebted to plffs for their
proportionable share of the reasonable value of the property which they took
& appropriated to their own use after the death of said Henry Antle
because the property was their own property lawfully & fairly acquired
from said decedent in his lifetime. They deny that the lands claimed &
occupied by defts George Antle, Letty Antle, John R. Antle, & Lewis Antle
rightfully & actually belong to the estate of said decedent, but on the
contrary the only land & property now owned or claimed by deft George
Antle that ever did belong to Henry Antle his father is imbraced &
described in a deed of conveyance from said decedent & wife to said deft
Lewis [word 'Lewis' marked through] George herewith filed, marked A & made
part of this answer. [Transcriber's note: see deed following.] This deed was
legally & properly made & executed upon a full, fair, good &
valuable consideration & conveyed the title of the property therein
described to deft George & the other heirs of said decedent have no
interest whatever in that property or any part of it. The only land &
property now claimed & owned by deft Lewis Antle that ever did belong to
the said decedent is imbraced & included in a deed of conveyance from said
decedent Henry Antle to said Lewis, herewith filed, marked B [copy not in my
possession -- transcriber] & made part hereof. said deed was legally and
properly made & executed & for a full, fair, good & valuable
consideration and passed & vested the title of the land therein described
in deft Lewis & is relied upon as a full & complete bar to the plffs
action so far as the said Lewis is concerned. The only land and property now
claimed & occupied by deft John R. Antle that was ever owned by said
decedent is described and imbraced in a deed of of conveyance from said Henry
Antle d____ in his lifetime to his son Henry M. Antle deft herein & deft
John R. Antle holds the same by purchase from his said brother Henry M. The
said deed to Henry M. was legally & properly made & executed & for
a full, fair, good & valuable consideration & passed & conveyed a
good title to the land therein described to deft Henry M. Antle the same be
filed herewith as part hereof as soon as it can be procured. They deny that
this land or any other part of any of the lands & property imbraced in
these deeds belong to all the heirs of said decedent or t any person or
persons whatever except the grantees on said deeds & those claiming under
them. They state that said deeds were all made when said Henry Antle dec'd.
was alive & in good health and of sound & disposing memory and mind.
They deny that said decedent Henry Antle was at his death the true and proper
owner of any part of the lands now claimed & occupied as aforesaid by
defts, Lewis, George, & John R. Antle. They deny that their said ancestor
Henry Antle was during his lifetime, or at any time after the execution of the
deeds aforesaid, in the full, free, unmolested & adverse possession of all
or any of the lands imbraced in the said deeds, claiming & holding them as
his own property. They deny that defts Lewis, George & John are now
holding said lands without right. They deny
that pltfs or any of them are the owners or joint owners, or have any
interest whatever in any part of the lands or property aforesaid now in
the possession of defts George, Lewis & John. They deny that the deeds
herein before referred to are void. They deny the charge that said deeds do
not pass the title to the property imbraced in them to the grantees therein.
They deny that said deeds are without consideration, void or voidable. They
deny that said deeds are not the acts and deeds of their said ancestor Henry
Antle dec'd. They deny, that for several years before the death of said
decedent (& before the execution of said deed[?s]) the said decedent was
on the account of his great age and long & habitual & excessive use of
intoxicating drinks & from disease of both body & mind, incapable of
mentally of conveying his land, or that he was incapable rationally &
properly of transacting any business of any importance. They deny that said
deeds were procured by the fraud of defts or any person or persons whatever.
They deny that they were not the voluntary acts of said decedents. They deny
that said deeds were not made by the grantor with a full knowledge of their
meaning & import. They were not obtained from dec'd by fraud. They deny
that decedent was greatly under the influence of his wife at any time or that
his said wife deft Letty took great pains to
cultivate an influence over him in order to induce to give to her &
her children all the property. They deny that any advantage was taken of his
age & helplessness of body & mind because he was neither mentally nor
bodily enfeebled when he made said deeds beyond the ordinary of age, & in
fact was remarkably strong both in body & mind for one of his age when he
made said deeds & was not as old as charged in the petition but was 79
years old only when he made the last of said deeds. They deny that defts or
any of them [?]either had or exercised an undue & improper & illegal
influence over said decedent at any time. They deny any & all improper
means or influences as charged for the procurement of the deeds herein before
alluded to. They deny that said decedent was not mentally capable of
understanding what he was doing when he made & executed said deeds &
each of them. They deny that he did not sign said deeds or that he signed them
from threats & compulsion, & not
of his own voluntary will.
They charge that
as to the arrangement & deed to deft George, his undertaking to support
his parents was a full & fair consideration for the property conveyed to
him, & the other lands were sold for a full price & their ancestor
never was at any time from any
cause demented beyond the ordinary effects of age & now having fully
answered they pray to be dismissed with costs & for proper relief.
/s/
George Antle
Letty Antle
Lewis Antle
John R. Antle
Samuel Floyd & wife
Henry M. Antle
by Hays p.D.
George
Antle says he believes the statements in the foregoing answer are true.
/s/
George Antle
Sworn before me
by George Ante Nov. 20th, 1860
/s/
Junius Caldwell CACC
by Nat Gaither Jr. DC
Transcriber's
notes:
The 'Hays'
above quite possibly was Joseph E. Hays, who practiced law in the
Russell/Adair area.
************
[Defts
exhibit] A
Filed as
a lawsuit exhibit November 22nd 1860
Att: Junius
Caldwell, CACC
Henry Antle Sr.
}
to }
George W. Antle
}
1859 February
12th full proven by the Oaths of John C. Lester & Sam'l Floyd,
Sub[scribing] Wit[nesses]
Att: Geo. Bryan,
clk [Russell County KY court]
Recorded in
deed Book P, page 196 [Russell County]
Tax & fees
paid
This deed
made this 11th February 1859 by and between Henry Antle Sr of the one part and
George w. Antle of the second part, son of said Henry Sr. Witnesseth that the
said Henry Antle Sr for and in consideration of the undertaking of the said
George W. Antle to sustain, keep & provide the said Henry Antle Sr and
Letty his wife with necessaries for and during their natural lives, doth sell
and convey unto the said George W. Antle two certain tracts or parcels of land
herein after discribed. The first tract lying and being in Russell County
Kentucky on the head waters of the Cabbin fork of Russells Creek and bounded
as follows, to wit: Beginning at
a sugartree thence N68 E56 poles to a hickory and elm, thence N28 W108 poles
to a hickory, thence S16 W70 poles to a gum tree & two dogwoods, thence
N25 W 54 poles to the beginning, containing twenty nine acres by survey, more
or less.
The 2nd tract
lays in the counties of Russell & Adair on the ridge between Crocus Creek
and the headwaters of the Cabbin fork of Russells Creek and bounded as follows
(to wit): Beginning at a stone in the Columbia & Creelsborough Road,
thence S46 E19 poles to a stone in the mouth of the lane [or land?] between
Henry M. Antle and this tract, thence N62 E111 poles to a poplar, thence S52
E76 poles to two dogwoods, thence N28 W226 poles to a poplar and two dogwoods,
thence, thence S66 W168 poles to a stake, thence S44 E162 poles to the
beginning, containing one [word 'one' marked out] by survey one hundred &
sixty one acres more or less together with the appurtenances thereunto
belonging, to have and to hold the same unto the said George W. Antle his
heirs and assigns forever, and the said Henry Antle Sr. covenants to and with
the said George w. Antle, that he will warrant the titles to the aforesaid two
tracts or parcels of land from and against the claims of all persons
whatsoever and the party of the first part also sells and conveys to the party
of the second part the following personal property (to wit): one four horse
waggon, double trees and gearing; one black mare; two head of cattle, eight
head of hogs; all of my household & kitchen furniture & farming
utensils; one set of blacksmith tools including bellows, anvil, vice, hammers
& fixtures, to have and to hold the same unto the said George w. Antle his
heirs & c. forever. It is understood that the said land and
personal property for the faithful performance of the undertaking on the part
of said George W. Antle to take care and provide the aid Henry Antle Sr and
Letty his wife during their natural lives with all necessaries for their
comfort and support. Given under my hand this day and year first above written
Witness
/s/ Henry Antle
/s/ John C.
Lester
/s/ Lettay Antle
/s/ Samuel Floyd
State of
Kentucky, Sct.
I George Bryan,
Clerk of the Russell County Court, certify that the foregoing deed of conveyance
from Henry Antle Sr to George W. Antle was on this day produced to me and fully
proven by the oaths of John C. Lester and Samuel Floyd, subscribing witnesses
thereto.
Whereupon I have
recorded the said deed together with this certificate in my office. Given under
my hand this 12th day of February 1859.
/s/ George Bryan, Clerk
************
Transcriber's
notes:
This quite possibly
is (a copy of) the original deed, not a handwritten copy of that recorded in the
clerk's office. Had it been hand copied from the Deed Book, there should be a
'copy attest' statement signed by clerk.
The signatures of
John C. Lester & Samuel Floyd are in distinctively different handwriting.
The signatures of Henry Antle & 'Lettay' Antle, however,
were written by the same hand.
************
(from the cover
jacket of the case file): 1861 May cont'd
(from the cover
jacket of the case file): 1862 May by agreement dism'd at Plffs costs
************
[End of
transcriptions.]