Court Orders of Scott County
Submitted By: Dixie Lee Blake
(nee Moore)
Hemet, CA.
|
NOTE: early records have burn/water damage... much information is
missing. Court Orders - 1793 Mar 26th, 1793: James Moon (Moore?) orphan of James (Saml) Moore de'cd came into court and made choice of John SaHatten? and Srail? Moore to be his guardian who thereupon endered into bond and security agreeably to law. May 1793: Ordered that James Lomas, John Thomason, George Posnell? and ____Moore or any three of them being Geos? ti James Weir a way for a road from the Ridge above Stenitt's to Lexington road near Thomapson's and to grant the conveyance and convenience that will attend establishment by the said road. |
|
Court Orders - 1794
1794 Ordered that Samuel Moore, Samuel Walker, Hugh Boyd and
James Walker or any three of them being___the most conventient way for a
road from Henry's Mill to the Mara Lick and a part to |
|
Court Orders - 1795
1795 (Writing terrible) Grant that nini pon mas be levied
at the Layaystu nub leonty-Lay to member Geroge Moore for so much paid
by him for the Bailary A Bnays near John Hankind |
|
Court Orders - 1797
p. 89 July 6 1797 |
|
Court Orders - 1798
September 1798 p. 118 The Court appointed to Samuel Moore one hundred acres of land sold to him by Samuel Stemto? dc'd conveying the same to said Moore by consent of the parties and the family. |
|
Court Orders - 1799
July 1799 p. 137 The signed report to the alterations
paid for by Benjamin Iond? in the month leading from his land to Craig's
Mill. In Obedience to an order of Scott County Court, the
alterations made in claiming the road from the end of Benjamin Iam's
Lane to Craigs Mill do find that the said alteration on the land of
Charles William and Robert Moore who are both milling and said to be in
line with public |
|
Court Orders - 1802
May 19, 1802 The viewers report on the alteration as prayed for
by Samuel Cooper was this day returned to Court in these words. Agreeable
to an order of your worships George Oldham, Thomas |
|
Court Orders - 1803
25 Feb 1803 Ordered
that William Moore orphan of John Williams dc'd be bound to George
Plummer for twelve years according to law. |
|
Court Orders - 1805
p. 273 ...said county and impround twelve fit person on Main Eagh?
Creek on
siad County and when....proposes to erect a water grist Mill for the
purpose
in said writ mentioned on the subsonding? have met as aforesaid and
being
first sworn and charged by the Sheriff to examine up and down said creek
as |
|
Court Orders - 1806
p. 290 William Moore Eagle Creek for refusing to make
oath....taxable property July 1806. |
|
Court Orders - 1813
p. 324 On the motion of George Moore leave is granted him. Keep laven? at his residence in Scott County who thereupon entered into bond contained as the law directs. .......acounty....Elijah Craig his..... March 1813 |
|
Court Orders - 1814
p. 337 It is ordered that James Moore be appointed surveyor of
the
road in the twelfth precinct of the second district in the plan
of Christopher E. Ocutt and that he with the lands residing in
the bounds of said Precinct keep the .....in lawful repair. |
|
Court Orders - 1816
p. 435 At....certificate of Alexander Lsunub? having
administed to
....Moore the oath respecting the importation of certain
slaves...mentioned
is returned and ordered to be recorded as follows. Scott
County...this day
personally Hugh MOore...that he had written this day last faded???
reserved |
|
Court Orders - 1826
Oct 1826 p. 3 The court commenced allowing claims against the county as follows: William Moore $14.00. |
|
Court Orders - 1827
19 Nov 1827 p. 52 The court proceeded to allow claims agst the county as To Wit: William Moore $11.00. |
|
Court Orders - 1828
16 Jun 1828 p. 93 An account of William Moore against the
Commonwealth for
sicteen dollars for a ....general and brop? Index furnished the county
clerks
office which is allowed and ordered certified to the auditor of Public
Accounts. |
|
Court Orders - 1829
April 20th 1829 p. 142 A sale bill of the estate of
Margaret Moore dcd this
day to court and ordered to be recorded. |
|
Court Orders - 1830
Jan. 18th 1830 p. 205 Ordered that George E. Moore
be appointed Collector
of the..... 1 in 77th Regiment and the said Moore in the Thos Theobalder??
entered into and acknowledged this bond in the penalty of P 188
conditioned
as the law directs. |
|
Court Orders - 1831
Thursday, Jan 27, 1831 p. 278 For several
accounts of George E. Moore
against the Commonwealth for four dollars 12 cents and the other for
five
dollars 25 cents are examined , allowed, and ordered to be certified to
the
audit of Publick accounts. |
|
Court Orders - 1832
Oct 15, 1832 p. 384 To William Moore $11.50, George E.
Moore $1.75, and
George E. Moore & Joseph Cooper $40.00 ordered that the sum be
allowed. |
|
Court Orders - 1833
Monday, July 1833 p. 427 An award to George E. Moore against the Commonwealth for $83.00. |
|
Court Orders - 1836
p. 273 Nov. 1836 James M. Lindsay and George E. Moore commissioners of tax this day came into court and took the oath and agreed by law with the exception of certain pensions stated to the court. |
|
Court Orders - 1837
1837 On motion of Eliza Jane Moore widow of Hugh
Moore dc'd is awarded
that Ada Payne, James H. Humphries, Samuel N. Daniff?? John Ewing or any
three of them being duly sworn be and to allot to Eliza Jane Moore her
dower
in the estate of her dc'd husband. |
|
Court Orders - 1838
p. 340 Mon, Mar. 19, 1838 An Testament of Notary
pruporting to be the last
will and testament of Jno MOore dcd was this day produced in court and
___by
the values of Gane? Miller and Hiram Moore and ordered to be recorded. |
|
Court Orders - 1839
Monday, Mar 18, 1839 p. 411 An appraisement of the estate of
Robert Moore,
dcd returned to Court and ordered to be recorded.
|
|
Court Orders - 1840
Jan. 20, 1840 p. 33 A settlement with the Administrator of Hugh A.
Moore, dc'd, were summarily submitted to Court and recorded according to law. |
|
Court Orders - 1842 |
|
Court Orders - 1843 pg 334 March Term 1843 First day March 6th 1843 E.N. Offutt Trustee et al Plaintiff against On Petition Harvey A. Moore & Scott S. Moore Defendants partners trading under the firm and style of H.A. Moore & Co, and James Moore and Crawford Moore This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion this suit abates as to the defendant Crawford Moore by the sheriff's return and the other defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of Five hundred and twenty nine dollars and 44 cents the debt in the petition mentioned with interest at the rate of six percentum per annum thereon from the 2nd October 1842 untill paid and also costs herein expended. Credit is to be given this judgement for the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars paid 11th February 1843 as per endorsement on note. pg 335 March Term 1843 First day March 6 1843 Henry Holtzelaw Plaintiff against On Petition Westley Moore Defendant This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Fifty seven dollars and 31 cents the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per centum per annum from the 14th December 1842 untill paid and also his costs herein expended. pg 339 March Term 1843 First day March 6 1843 John Ewing against C.C. Moore et al. Ordered continued. pg 340 March Term 1843 First day March 6 1843 John Ewing against C.C. Moore et al. Ordered continued. pg 345 March Term 1843 Second Day March 7 1843 William A. Withers and Richard Stowers trading under the firm and style of Withers and Stowers Plaintiffs against In Debt Harvey A. Moore and Scott Moore partners Defendants trading under the style and firm of H.A. Moore & Co, and Crawford Moore & Westley Moore This day came the parties by their attorneys and the defendants filed a demurer to the declaration herein which was joined, heard, and overrulled. And the defendants saying nothing further in bar or preclusion of the plaintiffs Right of Recovery. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum of Two hundred thirty eight dollars the debt in the declaration mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from the 10th February 1843 till paid and also their costs herein expended. Credit is to be given the foregoing judgement for the sum of five dollars paid February 14th 1843 per endorsement on the note. pg 345 March Term 1843 Second Day March 7 1843 William Gunnell and his wife Ann Gunnell Guardian of Susan Ellen Luke, John Jackson Luke and Jacob Farris Luke Plaintiffs against On Petition Harvey A. Moore & Scott Moore partners Defendants under the firm of H.A. Moore & Co, Crawford Moore, Westley Moore and James Moore This day came the plaintiffs by their attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum of Thirteen hundred and nineteen dollars and 91 cents the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from the 28th January 1843 till paid and also their costs herein expended. Credit is to be given the foregoing judgement for the sum of One hundred eleven dollars paid 20th May 1842, also the sum of ten dollars paid February 10th 1843, also the sum of ten dollars paid February 18th 1843 as per endorsements on the note. pg 345 March Term 1843 Second Day March 7 1843 Abigail B. Robison Plaintiff against On Petition Crawford Moore, Harvey A. Moore, Defendants Scott S. Moore, and Westley Moore This day came the plaintiff by her attorney and on his motion this suit abates as to the defendant Crawford Moore by the Sheriff's return and the other defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover from the defendants Harvey A. Moore, Scott S. Moore, and Westley Moore the sum of Two hundred seventy nine dollars and seventy five cents the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from October 20 1842 till paid and also her costs herein expended. Credit is to be given the foregoing judgement for the sum of Forty eight dollars and 50 cents paid April 11th 1842 as per endorsement on the note. pg 347 March Term 1843 Second day March 7 1843 John R. Desha Plaintiff against On Petition Harvey A. Moore & Scott Moore partners Defendants under the firm of H.A. Moore & Co, Westley Moore, Crawford Moore and James Moore This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion this suit abates as to the defendant Crawford Moore by the Sheriff's return and the other defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants H.A. Moore, Scott Moore, Westley Moore and James Moore the sum of Seven hundred thirty four dollars and 68 cents the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from the 1st June 1842 till paid and also his costs herein expended. pg 350 March Term 1843 Second Day March 7 1843 Timothy Hughes against Harvey A. Moore & Scott Moore partners trading under the firm and style of H.A. Moore & Co and Crawford Moore This day came the parties by their attorneys and the defendants filed a plea herein which was joined, and thereupon came a jury to wir, James M. Proff and eleven others who were elected tried and sworn well and truly to by this issue joined. After the jury were sworn the After the jury were sworn the defendants consented to withdraw their plea herein on motion of the plaintiffs attorney this suit is dismissed. pg 359 March Term 1843 Third Day March 8 1843 Jehosephat Polk Plaintiff against On Note Westley Moore Defendant This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and filed his note herein and also came the defendant Westley Moore in proper person and acknowledged himself indebted to the plaintiff in the amount of said note. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Six hundred sixty five dollars 52 cents the amount of said note with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from 15th October till paid and also his costs herein expended by consent of the defendant. It is ordered that the execution may issue herein on the foregoing judgement forthwith. pg 366 March Term 1843 Fourth Day March 9 1843 Jehosephat Polk Complainant against In Chancery H.A. Moore & Co Defendants This day came the complianant by his counsel and filed his bill herein and also came the defendants and filed their answer and by consent of all the parties herein the court pronounced a decree which is ordered to be recorded. pg 366 March Term 1843 Fourth Day March 9 1843 Robert Risk Complainant against In Chancery Crawford Moore Defendant This day came the complianant by his counsel and filed his bill herein and also came the defendants and filed their answer and by consent of all the parties herein the court pronounced a decree which is ordered to be recorded. pg 366 March Term 1843 Fourth Day March 9 1843 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery Westley Moore Defendant This day came the complianant by his counsel and filed his bill herein and also came the defendants and filed their answer and by consent of all the parties herein the court pronounced a decree which is ordered to be recorded. pg 369 March term Fourth Day March 9 1843 Thomas C. Graves Complainant against In Chancery George E. Moores heirs et all Defendants The commissioner this day returned and acknowledged a deed herein whis is ordered to be certified. pg 375 March Term 1843 Fifth day March 10, 1843 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery James Moore Defendant This day came the complainant by his counsel and filed his bill herein and also came the defendant and filed his answer herein and by consent the Court pronounced a decree herein which is ordered to be recorded. pg 375 March Term 1843 Fifth day March 10, 1843 Timothy Hughes Plaintiff against On petition James Moore Jr. and William Jones Defendants The defendants attorney this day filed grounds for a new trial herein and moved the court to grant a new trial on the grounds filed, which motion was heard in part and time was taken for further hearing. pg 404 March Term 1843 Fifth day March 10, 1843 Harvey A. Moore & Co Complainants against In Chancery A. Broadwell & others Defendants The answer of the defendants of A. Broadwell & A. Ashbrook heretofore filed in the court is now noted. The defendants counsel this day filed a notice of his motion herein and moved the court to dissolve the injunction herein which motion was submitted to the Court for a decree but the Court not being fully advised, it is ordered that time be taken to consider the same. pg 404 March Term 1843 Fifth day March 10, 1843 Harvey A. Moore & Co Complainants against In Chancery Johnathan Read & others Defendants The answer of the defendant Johnathan Read heretofore filed in the court is now noted. The defendants counsel this day filed a notice of his motion herein and moved the court to dissolve the injunction herein which motion was submitted to the Court for a decree but the Court not being fully advised, it is ordered that time be taken to consider the same. pg 408 March term 1843 Twelfth day March 18, 1843 Wesley Moore Complainant against In Chancery James Moore and others Defendant The amended answer of James Moore heretofore filed and sworn is now noted. pg 412 March Term 1843 Twelfth day March 18, 1843 Harvey A. Moore & Scott S. Moore partners under the firm and style of H.A. Moore & Co Complainants against In Chancery Ashbery Broadwill, Aaron Ashbrook, and Defendants James Moore The court this day pronounced the following decree herein which is ordered to be recorded as follows to wit. The court being now sufficiently advised on the motion herein to dissolve the complainants injunction do decree that the same shall be and is hereby dissolved except for the sum of $35 of the principal with the interest thereon of the judgements at law hereby injoined. It is further decreed that the complainants do pay to defendant Broadwill $42, being ten per centum damages upon the amount for which said injunction is dissolved. pg 412 March Term 1843 Twelfth day March 18, 1843 Harvey A. Moore & Scott S. Moore partners under the firm and style of H.A. Moore & Co Complainants against In Chancery Johnathan Reed, Crawford Moore, James Defendants Moore and Jehosophat Polk The court this day pronounced the following decree herein which is ordered to be recorded as follows to wit. The court being now sufficiently advised on the motion to dissolve herein. It is ordered and decreed that the complainants injuction herein be and the same is hereby dissolved except for the sum of $43.93 of the principal of the Judgement at Law with the interest on said sum for which amounts it is retained. It is decreed that complainants pay to Defendant Reed the sum of $63 being 10 percentum damages upon the amount for which said injunction is dissolved. pg 416 March Term 1843 Twelfth day March 18, 1843 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery Westley Moore Defendant The decree pronounced herein at the present term and ordered to be recorded is as follows. This cause coming in to be heard by consent of the parties thereto on the bill & exhibits & answers and the court being now sufficiently advised do order and decree that the property in the deed of trust mentioned be sold for the purposes therein mentioned. The real estate to be sold on a credit of six months and the personal property on a credit of three months. Bonds with approved security to be taken payable to the commissioner hereinafter appointed to have the face of replery bonds and the sale to be made on the premises. William Moore is hereby appointed a commissioner to carry this decree into effect who is directed to advertise the time & place of sale in some newspaper published in Lexington Kentucky for two weeks and also in three or more public places in Scott County prior to said sale. pg 416 March Term 1843 Twelfth day March 18, 1843 Robert Risk Complainant vs In Chancery Crawford Moore Defendant The degree pronounced herein at the present term and ordered to be recorded is as follows: This cause coming on to be heard by consent of all the parties thereto on the bill & exhibits and answer and the court being now sufficiently advised do order and decree that the property in the deed of trust mentioned be sold for the purposes therein mentioned. The real estate to be sold subject to the lien of Paul Leathers execution on a credit of six months and the personal property a credit of three months. Bonds with approved security to be taken payable to the commissioner hereinafter appointed to have the form of reply bonds and the sale to be made on the premises. Robert Risk is hereby appointed as commissioner to carry this decree into effect who is directed to a doctrine the time & place of sale in some newspaper published in Lexington Ky for two weeks and also in three or more public places in Scott County prior to said sale. pg 416 March Term 1843 Twelfth day March 18, 1843 Jehosaphat Polk Complainant vs In Chancery Harvey A. Moore & Scott S. Moore Defendants The degree pronounced herein at the present term and ordered to be recorded is as follows: This cause coming on to be heard by consent of all the parties thereto on the bill & exhibits and answer and the court being now sufficiently advised do order and decree that the property in the deed of trust mentioned be sold for the purposes therein mentioned. The real estate to be sold subject to the lien of Paul Leathers execution on a credit of six months and the personal property a credit of three months. Bonds with approved security to be taken payable to the commissioner hereinafter appointed to have the form of reply bonds and the sale to be made on the premises. Jehosaphat Polk is hereby appointed as commissioner to carry this decree into effect who is directed to advertise the time & place of sale in some newspaper published in Lexington Ky for two weeks and also in three or more public places in Scott County prior to said sale. pg 416 March Term 1843 Twelfth day March 18, 1843 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery James Moore Snr Defendant The degree pronounced herein at the present term and ordered to be recorded is as follows: This cause coming on to be heard by consent of all the parties thereto on the bill & exhibits and answer and the court being now sufficiently advised do order and decree that the property in the deed of trust mentioned be sold for the purposes therein mentioned. The real estate to be sold subject to the lien of Paul Leathers execution on a credit of six months and the personal property a credit of three months. Bonds with approved security to be taken payable to the commissioner hereinafter appointed to have the form of repling bonds and the sale to be made on the premises. William Moore is hereby appointed as commissioner to carry this decree into effect who is directed to advertise the time & place of sale in some newspaper published in Lexington Ky for two weeks and also in three or more public places in Scott County prior to said sale. pg 9 September Term 1843 First day September 4 1843 The President Directors & Company of the Bank of Kentucky Plaintiffs against In Debt H.A. Moore and S.S. Moore trading under the Defendants of H.A. Moore & Co, Crawford Moore, Westley Moore, James Moore, and Jehosaphat Polk This day came the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion this suit abates as to the defendants H.A. Moore and S.S. Moore by the Sheriff's return and the other defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants Crawford, Westley and James Moore and Jehosaphat Polk the sum of Twelve hundred dollars the debt in the declaration mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum till paid and also their costs herein expended. pg 10 September Term 1843 First day September 4 1843 The President Directors & Company of the Bank of Kentucky Plaintiffs against On Petition H.A. Moore & Scott Moore trading together Defendants under the firm and style of H.A. Moore & Co, Crawford Moore, Westley Moore and James Moore This day came the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion this suit abates as to the defendants H.A. Moore and S.S. Moore by the Sheriff's return and the other defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants Crawford Moore, Westley Moore and James Moore the sum of Four hundred dollars the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from March 18 1843 till paid and also their costs herein expended. pg 16 September Term 1843 First day September 4 1843 Elizabeth Moore Plaintiff against On Petition James M. Lindsay & Jesse S. Sinclair Defendants This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of Ninety one dollars and 41 cents the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from August 20 1843 till paid and also her costs herein expended. pg 23 September Term 1843 First day September 4 1843 Bank of KY against H.A. Moore & Co et al. In Debt. Ordered continued. pg 23 September Term 1843 Second Day September 5 1843 John Ewing Plaintiff against Scine Facias C.C. Moore et al Defendants The defendant filed a demurer herein to the Scine Facias which was joined heard and sustained. On motion of the plaintiff leave is given the clerk to amend the Scine Facias which was done by interlineation and the cause is continued. pg 29 September Term 1843 Second Day September 5 1843 George E. Moores Admin Complainant against In Chancery George E. Moores heirs & others Defendants This day came the complainant and filed his bill herein which is certified. pg 30 September Term 1843 Second Day September 5 1843 Timothy Hughes Plaintiff against On Petition James Moore Jr. Defendant On motion of the plaintiffs attorney leave is given him to withdraw the note sued on herein. pg 33 September Term 1843 Third Day September 6 1843 Solomon D. Foster Plaintiff against On Petition Westley Moore and Jno (alias John) Sheley Defendants This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of Eighty dollars the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from Jan 1 1843 till paid and also his costs herein expended. On motion of the plaintiff this suit is for the benefit of Ben C. Glass. pg 45 September term 1843 Fifth Day September 8 1843 James L. Moore against Andrew W. Eddins. Replevin. Ordered continued. pg 49 September term 1843 Sixth Day September 9 1843 Timothy Hughes Plaintiff against On Petition James Moore Jr. & others Defendants This day came the parties by their attorneys and the defendants motion of a new trial herein was fully heard and overruled. pg 50 September term 1843 Sixth Day September 9 1843 James S. Meese Plaintiff against In Covenant Westley Moore and Crawford Moore Defendants This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of One hundred fifty dollars and 37 cents in damages the debt in the declaration mentioned and also his costs herein expended. pg 51 September term 1843 Sixth Day September 9 1843 Margaret M. Slaughter Plaintiff against In Covenant Westley Moore and Crawford Moore Defendants This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of One hundred fifty six dollars and 38 cents in damages the debt in the declaration mentioned and also her costs herein expended. pg 51 September term 1843 Sixth Day September 9 1843 Margaret M. Slaughter Plaintiff against In Covenant Westley Moore and Crawford Moore Defendants This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of One hundred sixty five dollars and 37 cents in damages the debt in the declaration mentioned and also her costs herein expended. pg 71 September term 1843 Eleventh Day September 15 1843 Jehosophat Polk Complainant against In Chancery H.A. & S.S. Moore Defendants This day came the parties by their counsel and by consent the court pronounced a decree herein which is ordered to be recorded. pg 71 September term 1843 Eleventh Day September 15 1843 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery James Moore Defendant This day came the parties by their counsel and by consent the court pronounced a decree herein which is ordered to be recorded. pg 71 September term 1843 Eleventh Day September 15 1843 Robert Risk Complainant against In Chancery Crawford Moore Defendant This day came the parties by their counsel and by consent the court pronounced a decree herein which is ordered to be recorded. pg 71 September term 1843 Eleventh Day September 15 1843 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery Westley Moore Defendant This day came the parties by their counsel and by consent the court pronounced a decree herein which is ordered to be recorded. pg 73 September term 1843 Eleventh Day September 15 1843 H.A. Moore & Co Complainants against In Chancery John Points & Co Defendants The joint answer of John Points and Parker Alwell was this day filed. On motion of the defendants counsel a rule is made on the complainants for better security in the injunction bond herein on or before tomorrow morning or his injunction will be dissolved. pg 87 September term 1943 Twelfth Day September 16 1843 Harvey A. Moore and Scott S. Moore partners under the firm and style of H.A. Moore & Co Complainants against In Chancery Asberry Broadwell, Aaron Ashbrook and James Defendants Moore This cause being submitted and the court being now sufficiently advised do order and decree that this injunction herein be perpetuated for the sum of Thirty five dollars of the principal of said judgement at law, with the interest therein and that defendant Broadwell pay to the complainants their costs herein expended and that execution issue for the same. pg 87 September term 1943 Twelfth Day September 16 1843 Harvey A. Moore and Scott S. Moore partners under the firm and style of H.A. Moore & Co Complainants against In Chancery Johnathan Reed, Crawford Moore, James Defendants Moore and Jehosaphat Polk This cause coming on to be heard on the bill and answer it is ordered and decreed that the injunction herein be perpetuated for the sum of Forty three dollars and 93 cents of the principal of said judgement at law with the interest thereon and that the defendant Reed pay to complainants their costs herein and that complainants have execution therefore. **********pgs 92, 93, 94, 95 to be inserted later*********** pg 97 September term 1843 Twelfth Day September 16 1843 Joseph Desha and ? et al Plaintiff against On Petition H.A. Moore & Co et al Defendants Ordered that alias process issue herein and this cause is continued. pg 99 September term 1843 Twelfth Day September 16 1843 Westley Moore Complainant against In Chancery James Moore et al Defendants This day came the parties by their counsel and by consent this suit is dismissed.
May 1843 p. 242 Ordered that Crawford Moore be appointed Surveyor
of the |
|
Court Orders - 1843 pg 92 September Term 1843 Twelfth day September 16 1843 Jehosaphat Polk Complainant against In Chancery Harvey A. Moore & Scott S. Moore Defendants The decree ordered to be recorded herein at the present term is as follows to wit. Jehosaphat Polk the commmissioner herein this day filed his report herein which is received affirmed and ordered to be recorded and by the consent of parties to this suit it is further ordered that said Polk commissioner and trustee proceed to collect the amount of sales and to pay out and distribute the same as said as collected according to the provisions and terms of said deed of trust and the said commissioner is hereby directed to convey to the purchaser by deed with covenants of warranty etc the land sold to the purchaser thereof so soon as the purchaser shall pay the purchase money. The commissioners report ordered to be recorded in the above decree is as follows: To the Hon the judge of the Scott Circuit Court in Chancery sitting your commissioner appointed to carry into effect the decree rendered in the case of Jehosophat Polk against Harvey A. Moore and Scott S. Moore would respectfully report, that after having advertised as directed by said decree your commissioner on the 29th day of March 1843 proceeded to sell to the highest bidder at public auction all the property mentioned in said becree wich was produced. The land in said deed of trust mentioned has been sold for $505 by an execution in favour of Paul Leathers which was in the hands of the Sheriff of Scott prior to the execution of said deed which was less than two thirds of the value thereof and your commissioner sold the redemption right therein and herewith filed a list of said sales marked A and made part hereof. The list B herewith filed shows the amount collected by the commissioner from said sales. The list C shows the amount expended by the commissioner and paid out and retrined by him for making said sale. Your commissioner also files herewith the notes yet uncollected all which is respectfully recorded September 6, 1843. <signed> J. Polk Comr. pg 93 September Term 1843 Twelfth Day September 16, 1843 Robert Risk Complainant against In Chancery Crawford Moore Defendant The decree ordered to be recorded herein at the present time is as follows: The commissioner Robert Risk this day made his report herein which is received affirmed and ordered to be recorded. And by the consent of the parties to this suit the said Risk commissioner and trustee is ordered and decreed to collect the amount of sales and pay out and distribute the money when collected according to the provisions of said deed of trust. And the said commiss- ioner is further directed to convey the land sold to the purchaser thereof by deed with covenants of warranty etc so soon as the purchase money shall be paid. (The commissioners report ordered to be recorded in the above decree is as follows) To the Hon the Judge of the Scott Circuit Court in Chancery sitting. Your commissioner Robert Risk appointed to carry into effect a decree rendered in the case of himself as trustee & agent Crawford Moore would respectfully report that pursuant to said decree on the 4th day of April 1843 at the residence of said Crawford Moore your commissioner having previously advertised as directed by said decree the time place and terms ect proceeded to sell at public auction to the highest bidder all the property in the deed of trust mentioned except some grain and provender which had been used previously in feeding the stock and some hempseed etc which did not hold out according to the quantity in said deed mentioned, and some which was sold under an execution older than said deed and the hired negroes that were not produced. A list of all the property sold and the persons to whom sold and at what prices will more fully appear by refernece to a list thereof herewith filed marded A and made part hereof. List B shows the amount of money received therefore. List C the amount expended and paid out and amount retained by your commissioner. And the notes of the balance are herewith reported. All which is respectfully reported September 11, 1845. <signed> Robert Risk pg 93 September Term 1843 Twelfth Day September 16, 1843 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery Westley Moore Defendant The decree ordered to be recorded herein at the present time is as follows: The commissioner William Moore this day made his report herein which is received approved and ordered to be recorded. And by the consent of the parties to this suit, the said William Moore commissioner and trustee herein is decreed and ordered to collect the proceeds of said sale and pay out and distribute the same according to the provisions and terms of said deed of trust. And it appearing to the court that James S. Meese has purchased the land sold since said sale the said commissioner is hereby ordered to convey the same to the said Meese by deed with covenants or warranty etc so soon as the purchase money thereof shall be paid. The commissioners report ordered to be recorded in the above decree is as follows: To the Hon the Judge of the Scott Circuit Court in Chancery sitting. Your commissioner William Moore appointed by the decree in the case of William Moore against Westley Moore to sell the property in the deed of trust mentioned would respectfully report. That on the 6th day of April 1843 pursuant to said decree your commissioner having previously advertised the time and place of sale as directed proceeded to sell at public auction to the highest bidder all the property in the deed of trust mentioned except three horses and the crop of hemp which were sold by virtue of an execution issued and placed in the hands of a constable before the deed of trust was executed and two sheep that died before said sale. An account of said sale showing who were the purchasers and at what amounts etc is herewith filed marked A as part hereof. Your commissiioner would also report that he has collected the debts set forth in a list herewith filed marked B. And made part hereof which including the interest received thereon amount to the sum of $ <blank> and the notes not collected are herewith filed. Your commissioner would further report that as ________ as aforesaid he has paid out the sums set forth in a list herewith filed marked C and made part hereof for expenses incurred and debts mentioned in said deed of trust in the first class. And has retrined the sum of $104.11 being five per cent on the amount of sales for his attention thereto all which is respectfully reported September 2nd 1843. <signed> Wm Moore Commr pg 94 September Term 1843 Twelfth Day September 16, 1843 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery James Moore Defendant The decree ordered to be recorded herein at the present time is as follows: The commissioner in this cause William Moore this day made his report herein which is received approved to be recorded. By the consent of the parties to this suit William Moore commissioner and trustee herein is ordered and decreed to collect the proceeds of said sale and pay out the same according to terms and provisions of said deed of trust and the said commissioner is hereby directed to convey the land sold to the purchaser thereof by deed with covenants of general warranty etc so soon as the purchase money shall be paid. (The commissioners report ordered to be recorded in the above decree is as follows:) To the Hon. the Judge of the Scott Circuit Count in Chancery sitting. Your Commissioner William Moore appointed by the decree of the Scott Circuit Court in the cause of William Moore against James Moore would respectfully report that on the 5th day of April 1843 having previously advertised the time and place of sale as directed proceeded at the residence of said James Moore to sell to the highest bidder at public auction all the property in said deed of Trust mentioned except two horses that died before said sale and four barrels of corn and one kettle that were not produced and herewith files a part hereof marked A. A list of sales shewing the names of the purchasees the property sold and prices etc. Your commissioner also files a list marked B as part hereof shewing the amount of debts collected by your commissioner which with the interest therein received amount to $ <blank> and also a list marked C shewing the amount paid out by your commissioner for expenses incurred and debts paid of the first class in said Deed and the Sum of $134.56 the amount retained by your commissioner for making said sale being five per cent on the amount of sales. And the notes uncollected are herewith filed and noted in a list marked D all which is respectfully reported September 2nd 1843. <signed> Wm Moore Comr
|
|
Court Orders - 1844 pg 117 March Term 1844 First day March 4 1844 The President Directors & Co of the Bank of Kentucky Plaintiffs against In Debts Harvey A. Moore S.S. Moore (of the firm of Defendants H.A. Moore & Co), Crawford Moore, Westley Moore and James Moore This day came the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion this suit abates as to the defendant S.S. Moore by the sheriff's return and the other defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants H.A. Moore, Crawford Moore, Westley Moore & James Moore the sum of One thousand dollars the debt in the petition mentioned with interest at the rate of six percentum per annum thereon from May 17 1843 till paid. And also their costs herein expended. pg 127 March Term 1844 First day March 4 1844 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery James Moore Defendant The commissioner herein this day returned and acknow- ledged a deed to James S. Meese is ordered to be certified. pg 127 March Term 1844 First day March 4 1844 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery Westley Moore Defendant The commissioner herein this day returned and acknow- ledged a deed to James S. Meese is ordered to be certified. pg 131 March Term 1844 Second day March 5 1844 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery Westley Moore Defendant The commissioner herein this day returned herein which is ordered to be filed pg 131 March Term 1844 Second day March 5 1844 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery James Moore Defendant The commissioner herein this day returned herein which is ordered to be filed pg 139 March Term 1844 Third Day March 6 1844 Peggy Desha, Lucius J.B. Desha, John R. Desha and Adelaide Johnson who are executors & executrixes of the last will and testament of Joseph Desha decd and William Johnson husband of the said Adelaide Johnson Plaintiffs against In Debt Harvey A. Moore and Scott Moore partners Defendants trading under the style and firm of H.A. Moore & Co, and Crawford Moore, Westley Moore James Moore and Jehosaphat Polk This day came the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion this suit abates as to the defendant Scott Moore by the Sheriff's return and the other defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants Hrvey A., Crawford, Westley & James Moore and Jehosophat Polk the sum of Eighteen hundred fifteen dollars the debt in the declaration mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from June 4 1843 till paid and also their costs herein expended. Credit is to be given this judgement for the sum of Five hundred dollars paid October 12 1843. Also for the sum of Three hundred sixty six dollars 31 cents paid November 4 1843 as per endorsement on the note. pg 140 March Term 1844 Third Day March 6 1844 The President Directods and Company of the Bank of Kentucky Plaintiffs against In Debt H.A. Moore & S.S. Moore (of the firm Defendants of H.A. Moore & Co), James Moore, Westley Moore, Crawford Moore & Jehosaphat Polk This day came the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion this suit abates as the defendants H.A. & S.S. Moore by the Sheriff's return and the other defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants James, Westley and Crawford Moore and Jehosaphat Polk the sum of Four hundred dollars the debt in the declaration mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from March 14 1843 till paid and also their costs herein expended. pg 144 March Term 1844 Third Day March 6 1844 John Ewing Plaintiff against Scine Facias C.C. Moore et al Defendants On motion of the plaintiffs attorney the order made in the cause at the last term of the Court is so amended as to read the clerk of this court has leave to file an amendment to the Scine Facias herein which was done. pg 150 March Term 1844 Forth day March 7 1844 John L. Moore Plaintiff against In Reprevise Andrew J. Eddins Defendant This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant one cent in damages and also his costs herein expended. pg 159 March Term 1844 Fifth Day March 8 1844 Jehosephat Polk Complainant against In Chancery Harvey A. Moore & Scott S. Moore Defendants Ordered that Thomas H. Bradford the master commissioner of this Court do convey land sold herein to the purchaser on the payment of the purchase money. pg 164 March Term 1844 Seventh Day March 11 1844 John Ewing Plaintiff against Scine Facias C.C. Moore et al Defendants The defendant Robert Jones this day filed two pleas herein. The Plaintiff filed a demurer to the first plea which was heard and overrulled. The Plaintiff then joined said 1st plea and filed a replication to the 2nd which was joined and the case is continued. pg 184 March Term 1844 Ninth Day March 13 1844 George E. Moores Adm Complainant against In Chancery George E. Moores heirs Defendants It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that Margaret Moore, Mary Moore, Jane Moore, John Moore, Susan Moore, Catharine Moore, Thomas Moore and James Moore and Robert P. Rankin are now (or not) inhabitants of Kentucky. And they having failed to enter their appearances herein agreeably to law and the rule of this court. It is ordered that unless they do appear here on or before the first day of the next term of this court and answer the complainants bill the clerk will be directed to enter a general traverse of the allegations of said bill so as they are concerned. On motiion of the complainants counsel this cause is referred to the master commissioner of the court who is herely directed to ascertain and report the estate of every description. And to ascertain and report the debts against the estate. The commissioner is further ordered to advertise in some newspaper published in Lexington Kentucky. Also to advertise at the courthouse door in Georgetown that he will on or before the 1st day of August next hear proof of all claims against the estate of George E. Moore deceased. pg 227 September Term 1844 First Day September 2 1844 Timothy Hughes against H.A. Moore & Co et al. On Petition. Ordered that alias process issue herein and the cause is continued. pg 265 September Term 1844 Ninth Day Septemver 11 1844 J. Polk Complainant against In Chancery H.A. & S.S. Moore Defendants The commissioner this day returned and acknowledged a deed herein whis is ordered to be certified. Said commissioner is allowed five dollars for the execution of said deed. pg 267 September Term 1844 Ninth Day September 11 1844 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery James Moore Jun Defendant The commissioner this day returned his report herein which is ordered to be filed. pg 274 September Term 1844 Eleventh Day September 13 1844 William Moore Complainant against In Chancery James Moore Defendant Ordered that this suit be stricken from the dockett. p. 317 Oct. 1844 Claims submitted to Scott County: |
|
Court Orders - 1845
Feb. 17, 1845 p. 346 An instrument of writing purporting to be the
last will
Mar. 1845. An appraisement of the Estate of John Holding dc'd was
this day
|
| Court Orders
1846 pg 11 May Term 1846 Eighth Day May 12 1846 John Moore Plaintiff against On Petition Remus Payne and G.K. Smith Defendants This day came the plaintiffs attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $315.09 the debt mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from June 28 1842 till paid and also his costs herein expended. Credit is to be given this judgement for $50 paid January 2 1844. Also for $37.18 paid July 11 1845 as per endorsement on the note. pg 20 May Term 1846 Eighth Day May 12 1846 Timothy Hughes (for the benefit of Caleb B. Wallace) Plaintiff against On Petition Harvey A. Moore & Scott Moore partners Defendants trading under the firm and style of H.A. Moore & Co and Crawford Moore This day came the plaintiffs attorney and on his motion this suit is dismissed and leave is given him to withdraw the note sued on. Sep 1846 p. 96 Ordered that Valentine Rogers, James Risk,
James Moore Jr.
Oct. 1846 p. 104 Ordered pay to the following: Crawford
Moore waggon & p. 116 Dec. 1846 Orders that the clerk of this
court bind Vine a free girl |
Court Orders 1847
pg 182 May Term 1847 First Day May 3rd Aug. 1847 Ordered that Alfred Bradley be appointed surveyor of
the road in |
| Court Orders 1848
Aug. 1848 p. 239 On the motion of Thomas Kelsy who made oath and
together
pg 322 Febreary Term 1848 First Day February 28 1848
Feb. 1848 A Sale Bill of the estate of John B. Risk dc'd returned
into court
& ordered to be recorded. |
| Court Orders 1849
Jan. 1849 On motion of William Moore who made oath and together
with James
Moore and A. J. Miller his securities entered into and acknowledged bond
in
the penalty of $5000 conditioned according to law. Certificate is
granted
him for obtaining letters of Administration on the estate of W. L. Glinn
dc'd |
| Court Orders 1850
Oct. 1850 Ordered County to pay William Moore waggon
& team $.2.00 |
| Court Orders 1851
Jun 1851 On motion of N. Anderson it is ordered that Geo. Mads,
___Carr,
William Price and Thomas S (L) Moore or any three of them being first
sworn
according to law may act and be hereby appointed to view the ground
along
which a road is proposed to be by the foot to intersect the Cinncinati
Pike |
| Court Orders 1852
Jan. 1852 p. 87 James Moore
Motion for County Security |
| Court Orders 1853
Aug. 1853 Ordered that the lands of Moses Risk, Crawford Moore and
Daniel
Polk be placed on the road commencing at Dry Run Road and running to the
Muddy Fork. |
| Court Orders 1854
Mar 1854 p. 236 Thomas L. Moore a merchant this day paid the
clerk of this said amount $2.00 . It is ordered that a license to sell spirits in
quantities not less than a quart be granted to him for one year. |
Copyright ©
2001, 2002, 2003 2004
Copyright Notice: All files on this site are copyrighted by their creator.
No part of this web sight may be reproduced in any form without specific
permission from the submitter/owner and Barbara
Rice Although public information is not in and of itself
copyrightable, the format in which they are presented, the notes and comments,
etc., are.