1794  Ordered that Samuel Moore, Samuel Walker, Hugh Boyd and James Walker or any three of them being___the most conventient way for a road from Henry's Mill to the Mara Lick and a part to
Court the conveyence that will attend from the established by the said road.

1795  (Writing terrible)  Grant that nini pon mas be levied at the Layaystu nub leonty-Lay to member Geroge Moore for so much paid by him for the Bailary A Bnays near John Hankind

p. 79.  Ordered that Matthew Patterson, Hugh Emerson and John ____be appointed coms. for the special purpose of conveying by deed to Samuel Moore 100 acres of land on Cherrys Run being the same land
James Slenck dc'd in his lifetime sold but died before said deed was made.

p. 89  July 6 1797
The juries inquest on Colby Shipps ____of August____for ____ ____was this day returned to Court in these words.  We theundersigned____being duly qualified according to law being first charged by the Sheriff on the grounds of Colby Shipps on North Elkhorn where he proposes to ____a water grist mill in ____both sides of said dam being the property of said Shipp.  We have pro_____to___the lands___above and ___the property of ____; and find that ____the dam shall not be _____ ___ ___ ___ that neither the ___ ___ ___ ____ ____  Presents named the ? belonging to any person or person whatever wil ____thereby.  ___ ___ of papeye?? nor ordinary navigation will not be obstructed nor the
health of the neighbors___given under our hands and seals.
 6th day of July 1797
Thomas Fishton?
Robert Smith
Robert Moore
John Rogers
George Wood
Richard Brahorn?
Wm. Berty?
John Risk
James F. Tangrin?
Anthony Lindsay
Thomas Glop?

September 1798  p. 118  The Court appointed to Samuel Moore one hundred acres of land sold to him by Samuel Stemto? dc'd conveying the same to said Moore by consent of the parties and the family.

July 1799  p. 137  The signed report to the alterations paid for by Benjamin Iond? in the month leading from his land to Craig's Mill.  In Obedience to an order of Scott County Court, the alterations made in claiming the road from the end of Benjamin Iam's Lane to Craigs Mill do find that the said alteration on the land of Charles William and Robert Moore who are both milling and said to be in line with public
safety.  Given under our hands and seal this second day of July 1799.  
James Belo, Nathan Worley, Richard Inba?

May 19, 1802  The viewers report on the alteration as prayed for by Samuel Cooper was this day returned to Court in these words. Agreeable to an order of your worships George Oldham, Thomas
Brandt and James Kelly have view and served the alteration of the road by Samuel Cooper and find the new road 17 poles longer than the old road and are of the opinion that the new road runs
on nearly as close to the old road as possible.

 25 Feb 1803  Ordered that William Moore orphan of John Williams dc'd be bound to George Plummer for twelve years according to law.

25 Mar 1803 On this motion of James Kelly and Samuel Cooper it is ordered that Wm. Baford, George Oldham, Thomas Brant and Jno Thomason or any three of them being first sworn view the alteration
which they wish to make in the road leading from GeorgeTown to Henry's Mill and report to Court the Convenience or  Conveniences that will attend the proposed alteration.  Viewers report recorded.

27 May 1803  The jury inquest on John Branhams petition for persons to meet on North Elkhorn Creek in said county where John Branham proposes to erect a water grist mill after paying damages to said
Richard Branham twenty shillings, to John Rogers to the amount of six pounds 5 shillings and three pounds for backing up the water so as to obstruct the creek ford by erecting a dam 8 feet high from the surface of the water which overflowed.  Signed: Elijah Craig, Rodes Smith, John Davis, Toliver Craig, Jno Scott, Wm Smith, Henry Pery?, Robt Moore

p. 273 ...said county and impround twelve fit person on Main Eagh? Creek on siad County and when....proposes to erect a water grist Mill for the purpose in said writ mentioned on the subsonding? have met as aforesaid and being first sworn and charged by the Sheriff to examine up and down said creek as
well the land of others as of...County and are of opinion that by erective a greist Mill that the property of no person will be injured thereby...further with the Mansion?? House neither will fish of papage? be altered thereby or with the Health of the neighbors be annoyed by the level of the water and have...of land as the law directs and are of opinion the land six xhillings and nine pence and said Company owns the land on both sides of the Creek.  Given under our hand and seals...this day of September 1805.  Enoch Daly,
Henry..., John Smith, Robert Lyons, Andrew Downing Isaac MCristy, Jasper Hines, Jacob Swanger?  James Moore, John Moore, Samuel Simpson, William Jones...which report is ordered to be recorded and the mill established thereto.

p. 290  William Moore  Eagle Creek for refusing to make oath....taxable property   July 1806.

p. 287  Charles Moore and William Wright brought before the court for contempt and fined $2.00 each and ordered into custody of the Sheriff until the same shall be paid.

p. 324  On the motion of George Moore leave is granted him. Keep laven? at his residence in Scott County who thereupon entered into bond contained as the law directs.  .......acounty....Elijah Craig his.....  March 1813

p. 337  It is ordered that James Moore be appointed surveyor of the road in the twelfth precinct of the second district in the plan of Christopher E. Ocutt and that he with the lands residing in the bounds of said Precinct keep the .....in lawful repair.
Tues, May 3, 1814

p. 435  At....certificate of Alexander Lsunub?  having administed to ....Moore the oath respecting the importation of certain slaves...mentioned is returned and ordered to be recorded as follows.  Scott County...this day personally Hugh MOore...that he had written this day last faded??? reserved
from the state of Virginia to this state with the intention of becoming a citizen therein and hath agreeably to an act to assesed? the seal ext....concerning the importation of slaves....the oath specified I have
swear....that my....to the State of Kentucky and with an intention of becoming a citizen in thereof and that I have brought no slave or slaves...or will bring no slave or slaves to this state with intent of selling thm. 
Sworn to beofre me on the acting....of the peace and for the County of Scott aforesaid this 25th day of December, 1816.

Oct 1826  p. 3  The court commenced allowing claims against the county as follows: William Moore $14.00.

19 Nov 1827 p. 52  The court proceeded to allow claims agst the county as To Wit: William Moore $11.00.

16 Jun 1828 p. 93  An account of William Moore against the Commonwealth for sicteen dollars for a ....general and brop? Index furnished the county clerks office which is allowed and ordered certified to the auditor of Public Accounts.

Sep 15 1828  p. 104  On motion of Robert Moore adm is granted him on the estate of Margaret Moore dc'd who thereupon came into Court and took the oath given by law and culend? unto and acknowledged
bond in the sum of Four hundred dollars with John M. Moore his security and on this motion it is willed that Robert Adkins, Saml Velsey , LaBard? and Charles P. Williams or any three of them being past duly qualified be appt. Comm. to appraise in court the money, the personal estate of said dcd if any and
Report to Court.

On motion of John M. and Robert Moore it is deemed that Charles P. Williams, Lee Bard?, Robert Adkins and Saml Velsy? or either three of them being first duly qualified be appointed Comms to settle with William and Samuel Moore adms. of Robert Moore dc'd and report to court.

October 18th 1828  p. 122  Ann appraisement of the estate of Margaret Moore was this day returned to Court and ordered to be recorded.

April 20th 1829  p. 142  A sale bill of the estate of Margaret Moore dcd this day to court and ordered to be recorded.

May 10, 1829  p. 158  A motion of Robert Moore Adm of Margaret Moore it is ordered that Saml Moore, Wm Leach, La Bird and B. Osburn or othere three of them be appd Comms. being first duly sworn to settle with said Moore, his adm and report to court.

Aug 17, 1829  p. 159  The summons having been returned executed on the motion of Adm. Jones to establish a Road from Jones Mill to the Leestown.  It is ordered by this Court that a writ of ad giod??dam be awarded to Thomas Douharty, Jane McClure and Michael Fa....returnable.............

Nov. 17, 1829  p. 171  Court ordered to pay the following:  James Moore $1.00, Joseph Cooper  $1.50, James Moore $4.50.

p. 204  An account of George Sheely against the commonwealth for one dollar is examined allowed and ordered to be certified to the Auditor of Public Accounts.

Jan. 18th 1830  p. 205   Ordered that George E. Moore be appointed Collector of the..... 1 in 77th Regiment and the said Moore in the Thos Theobalder??  entered into and acknowledged this bond in the penalty of P 188 conditioned as the law directs.

Monday, Oct 18, 1830  p. 230  The Comms. appointed and on motion of William Moore praying on alteration of the nuday? find so as to now award his farm instead of through it as now.  Levi T. Smith, James Tofap?, Samuel Moore and Robert Allen or any three of them being sworn are appointed comms. to view the groud over which said alteration is proposed.  Beginning on the....ford....as when the dry run road runs through the Moore's place.  So as to pofs? round his farm and when the Muddy ford road....and report to Court the advantages and disadvantages that will affect the publick as ordered only.....

Thursday, Oct 20, 1830 p. 235  William Moore for $.75 claim ordered paid by the court.

Monday, December 20, 1830  p. 264  William Moore guardian for Mariad?  Miranda? Moore do this day in obedience.......(no more on page - black abyss)

Thursday, Jan 27, 1831    p. 278  For several accounts of George E. Moore against the Commonwealth for four dollars 12 cents and the other for five dollars 25 cents are examined , allowed, and ordered to be certified to the audit of Publick accounts.

Monday, Mar 21, 1831  p. 281  On motion of Robert Moore and Robert Adkins praying a road to be opened beginning at the road leading from D. Thomas mill to Grnn? Meeting house at the corner of Robert Adkins land and with his and Wm. Lyles line and the line of Robert Moore to the line of Wm Pratt then with Wm Pratts and Wm Gabs? line with said line to Thomas Loyes? line with said line and Wm Pratts line to the road from the great Springs to Gmn? Doyoun?  Meeting house.  The land over which said road is proposed to run being in this county.  It is ordered that Joseph Risk, Roobs? Baush, Ambrose Clayton
and Richard Wilson or any three of them being sworn be Comms. to view said road and report to Court the advantages and disadvantages that will result as will to the publick and the law.

p. 285  On the motion of William A. Searl praying on alteration on the Suggetts Mill road so as to road on the line between said line and Wm Johnson  Robert Baubridge  Milnor Haynes Robert Adkins and Robert Moore or any three of them being sworn and appointed Comms. to view the said proposed alteration
and report to Court the advantages and siadvantages that will result as will to the publick as to said as to lying in the county.

April 18, 1831  p. 289  The Comms apointed on the alteration of Robert Moore and Robert Adkins to view the alteration in the road this day , made their report and all the parties over whose land said alteration is proposed to have affected Wm. Rolts?  Wm Pratt and John Gayle?.   It is ordered that summons open against them when ablve to meet in Court to show cause why said alteration should not be carried out and the report is ordered to be filed.

Monday, May 18, 1831  p. 293  The court appointed on the application of Robert Moore and Robert Adkins to view route for a new road this day made their report which as reviewed and it is ordered that said road be opened agreeably to said report fifteen feet wide except at Angles so here the road must be twenty-five feet wide and Robert Moore is appointed surveyor of said road and it is ordered that he
keep said road in repair with the hands of himself, Robert Adkins and Wm. Gayle.

Tuesday, May 17, 1831  p. 296  Will of Anthony Lindsay, dcd. p. 299  Mary Lindsay, under 14, chose John M, Lindsay as guardian.

September 19, 1831  p. 319  Certified to Church in Georgetown:
James Risk
James Moore
William MOore

Oct 18, 1831  p. 322 An amount of George E. MOore against the commonwealth for $3.00 and $2.66 is examined and ordered to be paid.

Oct 15, 1832  p. 384  To William Moore $11.50, George E. Moore  $1.75, and George E. Moore & Joseph Cooper $40.00 ordered that the sum be allowed.

Monday December 17, 1832  p. 401  On motion of John Moore it is ordered that NOlan Smith  James Parker  Thomas H. Bradofrd and James Griffith or anya three of them being sworn and appointed Comm to pesaper??? this in this County and report to the Court.

Monday, July 1833  p. 427  An award to George E. Moore against the Commonwealth for $83.00.

p. 273 Nov. 1836  James M. Lindsay and George E. Moore commissioners of tax this day came into court and took the oath and agreed by law with the exception of certain pensions stated to the court.

1837    On motion of Eliza Jane Moore widow of Hugh Moore dc'd is awarded that Ada Payne, James H. Humphries, Samuel N. Daniff?? John Ewing or any three of them being duly sworn be and to allot to Eliza Jane Moore her dower in the estate of her dc'd husband.

p. 277  September 18, 1837  Payments of service to county: James Moore 2.00, Hannah Risk 25.00, Samuel Risk 1.00.

On motion of Eliza Jane Moore and the dau duly adm____is granted____on the estate of Hugh Moore dcd and the Eliza Jane Moore came into court and took an oath , signed and entered into and acknowledged the bond of $10,000.
                                           Secy  William Risk and Robert Hopkins

p. 308  The Bond and order of applicant and q ualification of Charles C. Moore Guardian for Wm. Alfna? Henley, Meredith Ann Emily Moore  orphans of Samuel T. Moore having been destroyed and the same having been proved in Court, the said Charles C. MOore came into Court and entered into and
acknowledged his bond in the penalty of $10,000 dollars with John W. Moore, his secy.

On motion of Thomas G. Moore, he is appointed guardian of Nancy Varfield? orphan of Ada Val(r)field dcd.  who came into court and executed a bond with George Water his secy on the penalty of $1400 accourding to law.

On motion of Jno Sheely Jr adm is granted on the estate of Jno Sheely Sr who thereupon came into court and took the oath before and entered into and acknowledged his bond in the penalty of $10,000 dollars with Julius C. Barston, John M. Moore his secy and on his motion William Allen, Jno Salfin?
Isaac Clenkenbeard and James Moore an appt commissioners to appraise the personal estate and slaves if any and report to court.

p. 310  On motion of Hannah Shelly, Wm Allen, John Slfin, Isaac Clenkenbeard and James Moore an appt comm to allot her dower in the slaves and lands of Jno Sheely dcd in Scott County.

On motion of Jno Sheely Jr, James L. Moore and Mary Anne his wife and Hannah Sheely who is guardian of Martha Jane Sheely and Samuel Sheely, the same comms an application to divide the negroes and lands of John Sheely dcd among his heirs at-law who are the persons above recorded.

p. 313  Martha Jane Shealy and Samuel Shealy orphans of John Shealy dcd over the age of 14 came into court and made choices of ___ mothers Hannah Shealy as their guardian and the said Hannah came
into court and acknowledged ___in the penalty of $8000 dollars with James Shealy and Robert Bar_ly her scy's according to law.

p. 330  On motion of Jno Sarah George E. Moore and Thomas Y(T?) Moore appointed to qualify and second deputies.(acputys??)

p. 340  Mon, Mar. 19, 1838  An Testament of Notary pruporting to be the last will and testament of Jno MOore dcd was this day produced in court and ___by the values of Gane? Miller and Hiram Moore and ordered to be recorded.

p. 349   May 21, 1838  Admission of the ___estate of Jno Sheley dcd....jonp St..Allstment of Amer...to the widow stated to court and admitted to be recorded.

p. 360  An appt of the estate of John Moore dec entred to court and recorded.

p. 362  John Shely a sole roll??? of the estate of John Shely dcd was this day named to court and ordered to be recorded.

p. 394  Mon., Dec 17, 1838 Leonard Moore is appointed surveyor of the road in place of Wm Shannon.

On motion of Ann Moore Admin is granted her on the estate of Robert Moore dc'd who thereupon came late ____ _____ ____ ___ by law and entered to and acknowledged her bond in the penalty of fourteen hundred dollars with I. W. Prato and Saml Moore her Secys according to law.

On motion of Anne Moore she is appt guardian of William Leggs Robert- JOhn, -Castro????MOore orphans of Robert Moore into and acknowledged her bond in the penalty of two thousand dollars 
unto I. W (M) Roato? and Saml Moore the secy according to law.

On motion of Ann Moore on behalf Sadif? an as guardian for the Cafelub??? heirs of Robert Moore dcd..  it is recorded according to law.

A sale Bill of the Estate of Hugh Moore and returned to court to be recorded.

Monday, Mar 18, 1839 p. 411  An appraisement of the estate of Robert Moore, dcd returned to Court and ordered to be recorded.

Aug. 15, 1839  p. 4  Gladys Maybree, Plaintiff vs. Thomas Y Moore, guardian for Maria Ranfield this day came the plaintiff and it is ordered that the said Moore be suspended as Guardian aforesaid.

Aug. 19, 1839 p. 6  George Winter vs. Thomas Y. Moore.  Motion for Counter Security.  Thomas Y. Moore, Guardian for Maria Ranfield.  This day came the Plaintiff by His attorney and this defendent in proper person who failed or refused to give order of Counter Security aforesaid whereupon it is ordered
that the Guardian is financially suspended and that the Plaintiff recover his costs therein.

Nov. 18, 1839  On motion of Jehosaphat Polk administration is granted him on the estate of Rhoda Polk, dc'd.  He thereupon came into Court and took the oath required by law and entered into and acknowledged his bond as the penalty of thousand dollars conditional according to law.  And on his motion
James Stucker, James Risk, Maj (?) Moore and Joseph Ewing or any three of them being first sworn, appointed in court evaluate the personal estate of said decedent and report to court.

On motion of Margaret Moore ordered that John Ewing, David Thornton, Jno W. Cmaboyh (?) and Garland Nubb or either three of them has appointed Commissioners to attest to her, her given in the Estate of her dc'd husband George E. Moore and report to Court.

Jan. 20, 1840 p. 33  A settlement with the Administrator of Hugh A. Moore, dc'd, were summarily submitted to Court and recorded according to law.

An allotment of dower to the widow of George E. Moore dc'd witnessed to Court and ordered to be recorded.

Mar 16, 1840  p. 39.  Allotment with the Administrator of Hugh A. Moore dc'd being filed and recorded.

Apr 20, 1840  (light & smeared)  Catherine P. Warren , an orphan of Thomas Warren was the age of 14 years this day came into Court and made choice of Jethro W. Moore as her guardian who thereupon came into Court and entered into and acknowledged bond in the penalty of six thousand dollars by oath of
Robert M. Ewing his security , conditional according to law.

July 20, 1840  p. 58  An instrument of writing reporting to be the last will and testament of Joseph Ewing dc'd was this day produced in Court and the body of said will was proved by Mortimer Price who thereupon made an oath and signed his name at the............And John Salphin, Robert Barkley, Wm. W.
Allen and HJoseph Allen proved the first codicil to said will and James Moore proved the second codicile and ordered to be recorded.

Nov. 16, 1840  A settlement with the Administrator of Hugh Moore, dc'd.

Dec. 20, 1840 p. 89  An allotment witht the Administrator of Hugh Moore, dc'd.

p. 98.  On motion of John M. Moore who wished to make an alteration in the Readings Mile Road in this county bewginning at his land and running north to George Beatty's line to Ben  (?) line at said Beatty's corner  finding that Benjamin Found(?) , M... Milland, John Wilson and Samuel Moore or any three
of them be approved came to court and viewed said proposed alteration and reported to Court the advantages and disadvantages that would affect the public as to provide alterations be established.

p. 99.  It is agreed that John M. Moore be permitted by the court to establish said road opposite his house and the other half on Beatty's line.

Samuel Moore is appointed surveyor of the road on the plan of William Nath. 

                                                            Court Orders - 1842

pg 17 January Special Term  January 19, 1842       Thomas C. Graves against George E. Moore hrs. In Chancery.       Ordered continued

Pg 23 January 20 1842       George E. Moore Adm against T.Y. Moore. In Chancery.  Ordered continued

pg 25 January Special Term  Third day  January 22, 1842
      Joseph Cooper                                  Complainant
         against                                     In Chancery
      George E. Moore Admin                          Defendant
      This day came the defendant by his counsel and moved the  court to dissolve the injunction herein which notion was heard but the court not being fully advised it is ordered that time be taken to consider the same and the cause is continued.

Pg 36 January 20, 1842
      Wesley Moore against James Moore et all. In Chancery.  Ordered continued

Pg 63 March Term 1842  First day.  March 7th, 1842
      James H. Daviess who is the administrator of the goods and chattles rights and credits of
      George E. Moore decd                           Plaintiff
           against                                               On Petition
      John Proctor, Joseph Cooper and Henry Haun     Defendants This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff  recover of the defendants the sum of one hundred and four dollars, the debt in the petition mentioned with interest therein at the rate of six percentum per annum from June 18th, 1838 till paid and also his cost herein expended.

pg 76 March Term 1842  First day  March 7th, 1842  Ordered that a summons issue against James S. Moore for failing to attend as a Grand Juror at the present term of this court.

pg 85 March Term 1842  First day  March 7, 1842 Lynn Wests Admin against C.C. Moore etal. On Petition.
      Ordered that this case be continued till the next term of this court.

pg 89 March Term 1842  Second Day  March 8, 1842
      Willa Viley                                    Plaintiff
        against                                      In Covenant
      John Moore and Archibald Sinclair in trade     Defendants 
 This day came the parties by their attorneys and by consent this cause is submitted to the court to decide the law and fact and the Court having heard the evidence and being sufficiently advised It is considered that the defendant Archibald Sinclair recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and the defendant John Moore being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant Moore the sum of three hundred seventy five dollars fifty cents in damages the debt in the declaration mentioned and also his costs herein expended.

pg 92 March Term 1842  Second day  March 8th 1842
      Joseph G. Lyle                                 Plaintiff
          against                                    In ?
      John Moore                                     Defendant
      This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant such damages as he has sustained in the premises but those damages being unknown to the Court a writ of inquiry is awarded him and thereupon came a jury to wit G.K. Smith and eleven others and being elected tried and sworn well and truly to inquire of damages upon their oaths returned the following verdict
      "We of the jury find for the plaintiff seventy five dollars in damages G.K. Smith Foreman". It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Seventy five dollars the damages by the jorors aforesaid assessed and also the costs herein expended.

pg 121 March Term 1842  Ninth day  Marth 16th 1842
      J.G. Lyle                                      Complainant
        against                                      In Chancery
      George E. Moores Adm etal                      Defendants
      This day came the parties by their attorneys and by consent this cause is submitted to the Court for a decree but the Court not being fully advised time is taken to consider the same.

pg 129 March Term 1842  Tenth day  March 17th 1842
      Joseph Cooper                                  Complainant
         against                                     In Chancery
      George E. Moores Admin                         Defendants
      The court being now fully advised of the defendants motion dissolve the injunction herein. It is ordered that the same be overruled and the cause in continued.

pg 132 March Term 1842  Tenth day  Marty 17th 1842
      J.G. Lyle                                      Complainant
        against                                      In Chancery
      George E. Moores heirs et al                   Defendants
      On the affidavit of J.G. Lyle in open court the submission of this cause is set aside. And on his motion
      leave is given him to file an ammended bill herein which was filed and the cause continued.

pg 156 June Term 1842  First day  June 6th 1842
      Asberry Boradwell                              Plaintiff
         against                                     On Petition
      Harvey A. Moore and Scott Moore partners       Defendants
      trading under the firm of H.A. Moore & Co
      This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion this suit abates as to the defendant Harvey A. Moore, by the sheriff's return. And the other defendant being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant Scott Moore the sum of Four hundred forty five 57/100 dollars the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from March 10, 1942 till paid and also his costs expended.

pg 164 June Term 1842  First day  June 6, 1842
      Johnathan Reed                                 Plaintiff
         against                                     On Petition
      Harvey A. Moore and Scott Moore, partners      
      Defendants in trade trading under the firm and style of H. A. Moore & Co, Crawford Moore & James Moore This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion this first abates to the defendant Harvey A. Moore by the Sheriff's return. And the other defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants Scott Moore, Crawford Moore, and James Moore the sum of Six hundred fifty two 81/100 dollars for the debt in the petition mentioned with interes thereon at the  rate of six per centum per annum from March 29, 1842 till
paid and also his costs herein expended.

pg 167 June Term 1842  June 6th 1842
      James Moore Jr.                                Plaintiff
           against                                   On Petition
      Timothy Hughes                                 Defendant
      This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of four hundred and forty four dollars, the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from May 16, 1842 till paid and also his costs herein expended.  Credit is to be given the foregoing judgement for the sum of eighty seven dollars 24 cents paid November 16, 1841. Also for the sum of one hundred thirteen 12/100 dollars paid May 17, 1842 as per endorsement on the note.

pg 172 June Term 1842  First day  June 6, 1842
      Lynn Weston Adm against C.C. Moore et al. On Petition
      Ordered that this cause be continued till the next term of this Court.

pg 173 June Term 1842  First day  June 6, 1842
      John Ewing                                   Plaintiff
        against                                    In Case
      C.C. Moore                                   Defendant
      On motion of the defendant a rule is made on the plaintiff to file a bill of particulars on or before the calling of the cause or his suit will be dismissed.

pg 194 June Term 1842  Ninth day  June 15, 1942
      John Ewing                                   Plaintiff
        against                                    In Case
      Cadwallader C. Moore                         Defendant
      This day came the parties by their attorneys and by consent the defendant pleaded the general issue with leave to either party to give any matter in evidence which might be pleaded or replied which was joined and thereupon came a Jury to wit Jabred Offutt and eleven others who being elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue joined upon their oaths returned the following verdict:  "We of the jury find for the plaintiff twenty five dollars in damages, Jabret Offutt foreman." Therefore it is considered by the court that the plaintiff receive of the defendant the damages by the jurors aforesaid assessed.  And it is further considered by the Court that the defendant recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended.

pg 195 June term 1842  Ninth day  June 15, 1842
      Hiram C. Stevenson                           Plaintiff
        against                                    On Debt
      Cadwallader C. Moore                         Defendant
      This day came the plaintiff by his attorney. And also came the defendant Cadwallader C. Moore and acknowledged himself indebted to the plaintiff in the amount of the debt in the declaration mentioned. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of two hundred and forty five 64/100 dollars the debt in the declaration mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from August 15, 1837 till paid and also his costs herein expended. By consent of the plaintiff the defendant is released from the custody of the Sheriff herein. And by consent of the defendant, the plaintiff may sue? but execution on his judgement forthwith.

pg 207 June term 1842  Eleventh day  June 17, 1842
      Wesley Moore                                 Complainant
        against                                    In Chancery
      James Moore and others                       Defendants
      The complainants counsel this day filed exception to the defendants answer.

pg 220 June Term 1842  Eleventh day  June 17, 1942
      George E. Moores Adm                         Complainant
         against                                   In Chancery
      Reuben Cavender, Thomas Y. Moore             Defendents
      The defendant Rueben Cavender this day filed his answer herein.

pg 232 September Term 1842  First Day  September 5 1842
      Lewis West and Clinton West                  Plaintiffs
         against                                   On Petition
      C.C. Moore and J.H. Herndon                  Defendants
      This day came the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion this suit abates as to the defendant Herndon by the sheriffs return and the other defendant being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant Moore the sum of One hundred and sixty dollars the debt in the petition mentioned with interest at the rate of six per centum per annum from December 21, 1836 till paid and also their costs herein expended.

pg 240 September Term 1842  First day  Sept Term 1842
      John Points                                  Plaintiff
        against                                    On Petition
      H.A. Moore and Scott Moore                   Defendants
      under the firm of H.A. Moore & Co and James Moore
      This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recoved of the defendants the sum of One hundred seventy eight dollars 80 cents the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from Decemver 25, 1841 till paid and also his costs herein expended. Credit is to be given the judgement for the sum of forty dollars paid May 31, 1842 as per endorsement on the note.

pg 241 September Term 1842  First day  Sept Term 1842
      Elmus Crenshaw                               Plaintiff
        against                                    On Petition
      Harvey A. Moore & Scott Moore partners       Defendants
      trading under the firm and style of H.A. Moore & Co, and James Moore, Westley Moore,
      Crawford Moore and Jehosephat Polk 
      This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of eight
hundred and nineteen dollars the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from July 8, 1841 till paid and also his costs herein expended. Credit is to be given this
judgement for the sum of four hundred dollars paid January 17, 1842 as per endorsement on the note.

pg 241 September Term 1842  First day  Sept Term 1842
      Willa Viley                                  Plaintiff
        against                                    On Petition
      Westley Moore                                Defendant
      This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of ninety four 25/100 dollars the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from June 21, 1842 till paid and also his costs herein expended.

pg 243 September Term 1842  First day  September 5, 1842
      Paul Leathers                                Plaintiff
        against                                
      Harvey A. Moore & Scott S. Moore             Defendants
      partners trading together under the firm and style of H.A. Moore & Co and Crawford Moore
      This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendants being duly warned came not but made default.  It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of nine hundred and twenty three dollars 41 cents the debt in the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from May 25, 1842 till paid and also his costs herein expended.
 
pg 274 September Term 1842  Eleventh day  September 16 1842
      George E. Moores Adm                         Complainant
         against                                   In Chancery
      Thomas Y. Moore and other                    Defendants
      This day came the complainant by his counsel and on his motion this suit is dismissed.

pg 277 September Term 1842  Eighth day  September 12 1842
      Lewis West and Clinton West                  Plaintiffs
          against                                  On Petition
      C.C. Moore and T.H. Herndon                  Defendants
      This day came the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion the judgment rendered herein at the present time is set aside. And the defendants being duly warned came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum of one hundred and sixty dollars the debt on the petition mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from December 21, 1836 till paid and also their costs herein expended.

pg 285 September Term 1842  Ninth day  September 14, 1842
      Joseph Cooper                                Complainant
         against                                   In Chancery
      George E. Moore Adm                          Defendant
      The defendant this day moved the court to dissolve the injunction herein, but the court not being fully advised time is taken to consider the same.

pg 287 September Term 1842  Tenth day  September 15, 1842
      Joseph Cooper                                Complainant
          against                                  In Chancery
      James H. Daviess Administrator of            Defendant
      George E. Moore deceased
      This day came the parties by their counsel and the defendants motion to dissolve the injunction herein was overrulled. And by consent this cause is submitted to the Court for a decree and the Court being fully advised do decree that the injunction herein be persituated as to the judgement enjoined. And by consent it is decreed that the  ______ therein be dismissed without prejudice to a future suit and that the defendant pay the complainant his costs herein expended.

pg 293 September term  Eleventh Day  September 16 1842
      J.G. Lyle                                    Complainant
         against                                   In Chancery
      George Moores heirs & others                 Defendants
      It appearing to the satisfaction of the court that the complainant has departed this life it is ordered that
      this suit abate.